<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Explorer 7 out in the wild</title>
	<link>http://www.binaryslate.co.uk/archives/2006/10/19/internet-explorer-7-out-in-the-wild/</link>
	<description>my attempt to add a bit more detritus to t'interweb</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.binaryslate.co.uk/archives/2006/10/19/internet-explorer-7-out-in-the-wild/#comment-17787</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.binaryslate.co.uk/archives/2006/10/19/internet-explorer-7-out-in-the-wild/#comment-17787</guid>
		<description>I'm using a transitional doctype too, and it can cause problems with IE7.

I've got IE7 on my Windows desktop, but I'm leaving IE6 on my laptop for as long as possible, so I can easily test with both versions.

There are various standalone IE6 installers out there, but I haven't tried them. I have used standalone versions of IE5 and IE5.5 for testing purposes in the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using a transitional doctype too, and it can cause problems with IE7.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got IE7 on my Windows desktop, but I&#8217;m leaving IE6 on my laptop for as long as possible, so I can easily test with both versions.</p>
<p>There are various standalone IE6 installers out there, but I haven&#8217;t tried them. I have used standalone versions of IE5 and IE5.5 for testing purposes in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.binaryslate.co.uk/archives/2006/10/19/internet-explorer-7-out-in-the-wild/#comment-17762</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.binaryslate.co.uk/archives/2006/10/19/internet-explorer-7-out-in-the-wild/#comment-17762</guid>
		<description>I've not dared try it yet!

I'm using the transitional doctype atm, I really want to move over to the strict doctype, I know I should as i've removed all none semantic tags.

Have you tried 7 yet? Can it be installed alongside older IE?  It  would be nice to still have the more utilised version purely for development testing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve not dared try it yet!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m using the transitional doctype atm, I really want to move over to the strict doctype, I know I should as i&#8217;ve removed all none semantic tags.</p>
<p>Have you tried 7 yet? Can it be installed alongside older IE?  It  would be nice to still have the more utilised version purely for development testing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.binaryslate.co.uk/archives/2006/10/19/internet-explorer-7-out-in-the-wild/#comment-17760</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.binaryslate.co.uk/archives/2006/10/19/internet-explorer-7-out-in-the-wild/#comment-17760</guid>
		<description>Apparently 'Quirks Mode' is unchanged from IE6, so if you don't declare a doctype you'll be fine.

If you're like me try and to write valid XHTML with CSS layout, expect a few quirks here and there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently &#8216;Quirks Mode&#8217; is unchanged from IE6, so if you don&#8217;t declare a doctype you&#8217;ll be fine.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re like me try and to write valid XHTML with CSS layout, expect a few quirks here and there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
